Research in social sciences largely depends on measurements
and analysis and interpretation of numerical as well as non numerical data. Quantitative research methods focus on statistical
approaches and qualitative methods are based on content analysis, comparative analysis, grounded theory, and interpretation
(Strauss, 1990). Quantitative methods emphasise on objective measurements and numerical analysis of data collected through
polls, questionnaires or surveys and qualitative research focuses on understanding social phenomena through interviews, personal
comments etc. Quantitative and qualitative methods are studied within the context of positivistic and phenomenological paradigms
(Papers4you.com, 2006).
The applications of research methods could be studied
in the context of business and management or in social psychology to understand a social process. Some of the basic tools
for qualitative or quantitative research are related to data collection methods which can be case studies, questionnaires
or interviews (Simon et al, 1985). Research methods in management focus on leadership studies and leadership issues are examined
in accordance with contingency theory and organisational theory. The effects of leadership are best studied with the help
of qualitative or quantitative research methods and analyses of questionnaires sent to participants in management positions.
Research methods are however focused not just on
management issues but also on social process for example a study on the interaction between age, physical exercise and gender.
Some disadvantages and possible flaws of such methods may be related to abuse or misuse of interview techniques, inadequacy
of data collection methods and reliability of data. The methodological approach and data collection techniques are important
in research and form an important aspect of study (Simon, 1985). The case study approach is especially useful in analysis
of business environments and perceptual mapping techniques are used for marketing research. Focus groups and surveys are used
as other preferred methods of data collection, especially within business environments (Papers4you.com, 2006).
Interpretive research can be considered as an important
aspect of qualitative analysis, although as with all qualitative data, subjective bias can be a deterrent in the validity
of such approaches. In studying research methods, it would be necessary to highlight the differences between qualitative and
quantitative methods although it has also been argued that an integrated approach to social analysis could close in the gap
between quantitative and qualitative methods and both these methods could be used for social research studies. In fact there
may not be a specified correct method of research as each method seems to have its strengths and weaknesses and these factors
should be examined carefully before a particular method is selected or used for studying a social process.
Bibliography
Champion, Dean J. (1981) Basic statistics for social
research / Dean J. Champion. 2nd ed. New York : Macmillan ; London : Collier
Macmillan
Papers For You (2006) "P/B/685. Qualitative research
methods", Available from http://www.coursework4you.co.uk/sprtdis18.htm [22/06/2006]
Papers For You (2006) "C/B/397. Critically assess
and compare the strengths and limitations of qualitative and quantitative research methods. Use concrete examples to support
your arguments", Available from http://www.coursework4you.co.uk/sprtdis18.htm [21/06/2006]
Strauss, Anselm L. (1990) Basics of qualitative
research: grounded theory procedures and techniques / Anselm Strauss and Juliet Corbin. Newbury
Park, Calif.: Sage Publications,
Simon, Julian Lincoln. (1985) Basic research methods in social science / Julian Simon, Paul Burstein 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill,
