Guide on How to Write University Essays, Courseworks, Assignments and Dissertations

Porter's Generic Strategies

Home
Articles Library
Medicine, Psychology and Sociology Articles
Business Articles
Economics Articles
Industry Lifecycle
Marketing Mix
McKinsey 7S Framework
Product Life Cycle
Ansoff Analysis
BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Value Chain
Porter's Generic Strategies
Scenario Planning
PEST analysis
SWOT Analysis
Porter's 5 Forces analysis
Sitemap
Comments about this web site
Favorite Links
How to write an Essay
How to Write the Coursework or Report
How to write the Marketing or Marketing Communications Campaign
How to write the Dissertation
Where to start?
How to choose an area of research
How to define Issue or Argument
How to define Issue or Argument
How and where to review the literature
Research Methods
Dissertation Structure
Some tips to survive your dissertation: some predictable crisis
Important tips to succeed the dissertation
Databases of Academic Journals and Publications; Market Data
Essay Sites
Student Tricks
Exam Preparation Tips
Company-Based Reports
BALANCED SCORECARD
Critical Success Factors
Competitor Analysis
Review

The article focuses on the main aspects of Porter’s generic strategies. The three generic strategies of cost leadership, differentiation, and focus are discussed along with the advantages and risks inherent with each strategic option. The article includes tips for students and analysts on how to write good generic strategies analysis for a firm. Moreover, sources of findings information for generic strategies analysis have been discussed. The limitations of Porter’s generic strategies analysis have been discussed, and the relationship between these strategies and industry forces is also discussed.

 

Porter’s Generic Strategies Analysis

Introduction

Porter’s generic strategies framework constitutes a major contribution to the development of the strategic management literature. Generic strategies were first presented in two books by Professor Michael Porter of the Harvard Business School (Porter, 1980, 1985). Porter (1980, 1985) suggested that some of the most basic choices faced by companies are essentially the scope of the markets that the company would serve and how the company would compete in the selected markets. Competitive strategies focus on ways in which a company can achieve the most advantageous position that it possibly can in its industry (Pearson, 1999). The profit of a company is essentially the difference between its revenues and costs. Therefore high profitability can be achieved through achieving the lowest costs or the highest prices vis--vis the competition. Porter used the terms ‘cost leadership’ and ‘differentiation’, wherein the latter is the way in which companies can earn a price premium.

 

Main aspects of Porter’s Generic Strategies Analysis

Companies can achieve competitive advantages essentially by differentiating their products and services from those of competitors and through low costs. Firms can target their products by a broad target, thereby covering most of the marketplace, or they can focus on a narrow target in the market (Lynch, 2003) (Figure 1). According to Porter, there are three generic strategies that a company can undertake to attain competitive advantage: cost leadership, differentiation, and focus.

Figure 1

Source: Porter (1985)

Porter’s three generic strategies are discussed in more detail in the following section.

Cost leadership

The companies that attempt to become the lowest-cost producers in an industry can be referred to as those following a cost leadership strategy. The company with the lowest costs would earn the highest profits in the event when the competing products are essentially undifferentiated, and selling at a standard market price. Companies following this strategy place emphasis on cost reduction in every activity in the value chain. It is important to note that a company might be a cost leader but that does not necessarily imply that the company’s products would have a low price. In certain instances, the company can for instance charge an average price while following the low cost leadership strategy and reinvest the extra profits into the business (Lynch, 2003). Examples of companies following a cost leadership strategy include RyanAir, and easyJet, in airlines, and ASDA and Tesco, in superstores.

The risk of following the cost leadership strategy is that the company’s focus on reducing costs, even sometimes at the expense of other vital factors, may become so dominant that the company loses vision of why it embarked on one such strategy in the first place.

 

Differentiation

When a company differentiates its products, it is often able to charge a premium price for its products or services in the market. Some general examples of differentiation include better service levels to customers, better product performance etc. in comparison with the existing competitors. Porter (1980) has argued that for a company employing a differentiation strategy, there would be extra costs that the company would have to incur. Such extra costs may include high advertising spending to promote a differentiated brand image for the product, which in fact can be considered as a cost and an investment. McDonalds , for example, is differentiated by its very brand name and brand images of Big Mac and Ronald McDonald.

Differentiation has many advantages for the firm which makes use of the strategy. Some problematic areas include the difficulty on part of the firm to estimate if the extra costs entailed in differentiation can actually be recovered from the customer through premium pricing. Moreover, successful differentiation strategy of a firm may attract competitors to enter the company’s market segment and copy the differentiated product (Lynch, 2003).

Focus

Porter initially presented focus as one of the three generic strategies, but later identified focus as a moderator of the two strategies. Companies employ this strategy by focusing on the areas in a market where there is the least amount of competition (Pearson, 1999). Organisations can make use of the focus strategy by focusing on a specific niche in the market and offering specialised products for that niche. This is why the focus strategy is also sometimes referred to as the niche strategy (Lynch, 2003). Therefore, competitive advantage can be achieved only in the company’s target segments by employing the focus strategy. The company can make use of the cost leadership or differentiation approach with regard to the focus strategy. In that, a company using the cost focus approach would aim for a cost advantage in its target segment only. If a company is using the differentiation focus approach, it would aim for differentiation in its target segment only, and not the overall market.

This strategy provides the company the possibility to charge a premium price for superior quality (differentiation focus) or by offering a low price product to a small and specialised group of buyers (cost focus). Ferrari and Rolls-Royce are classic examples of niche players in the automobile industry. Both these companies have a niche of premium products available at a premium price. Moreover, they have a small percentage of the worldwide market, which is a trait characteristic of niche players. The downside of the focus strategy, however, is that the niche characteristically is small and may not be significant or large enough to justify a company’s attention. The focus on costs can be difficult in industries where economies of scale play an important role. There is the evident danger that the niche may disappear over time, as the business environment and customer preferences change over time.

Stuck in the middle

According to Porter (1980), a company’s failure to make a choice between cost leadership and differentiation essentially implies that the company is stuck in the middle. There is no competitive advantage for a company that is stuck in the middle and the result is often poor financial performance (Porter, 1980). However, there is disagreement between scholars on this aspect of the analysis. Kay (1993) and Miller (1992) have cited empirical examples of successful companies like Toyota and Benetton, which have adopted more than one generic strategy. Both these companies used the generic strategies of differentiation and low cost simultaneously, which led to the success of the companies.

 

These excellent papers contain Porter's Generic Strategies

 

C/M/3000. Service operating strategy for new chain of Italian restaurants

C/B/4222. Corporate strategies of Dell and Hewlett-Packard

C/B/4009. An examination of IKEA in reference to Porter's Generic Strategies and Bowman's Strategy Clock

C/B/3840. Kellogg's growth strategy in India

C/M/2139. A critical evaluation of strategic management

C/B/3801. Generic strategy of British Petroleum

C/B/3310. Strategic analysis of Innocent Drinks

C/B/3195. Examination of cost leadership

C/B/2998. Competitive environment evaluation of AstraZeneca

C/B/2655. SWOT analysis of IKEA's business and generic strategies

C/B/2654. Resource Based View of Strategic Management in Euro Disney

C/B/2653. Wal-Mart's Generic and Business Strategy

C/B/2500. Start-up strategies for new business

C/M/1319. Dissertation. Knowledge Management in MOTO

C/B/2103. Low cost strategy: case study of Southwest Airlines

C/B/2102. Report on Southwest Airlines

C/M/1239. Contemporary Theories of Strategic Management and their Implications for Construction Industry and Balfour Beatty

C/B/1977. Porter's Generic Strategies Analysis of Wetherspoons

C/B/1973. Porter's Generic Strategies Analysis of Ted Baker

C/B/1961. Porter's Generic Strategies Analysis of 7-Eleven

C/B/1948. Porter's Generic Strategies Analysis of Red & Hot

C/B/1915. Porter's Generic Strategies Analysis of JC Penney's

C/B/1874. Porter's Generic Strategies Analysis of Dairy Crest

C/B/1811. Porter's Generic Strategies Analysis of Amrikko

C/B/1802. Porter's Generic Strategies Analysis of Air Southwest

S/B/479. Business and Financial Performance of Tesco in 2006-2007

S/B/464. To what extent can the concept of Generic Strategies help to explain the Competitive Advantage of UK fashion retailers?

C/B/1457. Developing Effective Corporate Strategy for Air Southwest

C/M/1021. Strategy of Recent Marketing Innovation in Financial Services Industry

C/B/1064. Report on Strategy of RyanAir

C/B/1216. Strategic evaluation of proposed merger between BA and Iberia

C/B/970. Sustainable Competitive Advantage through Cost Leadership Strategies

C/B/988. Porter's Competitive Strategy: Various Perspectives

S/B/343. Porter's Generic Competitive Strategies

C/B/595. Cost Leadership and Differentiation Strategies: Is a Hybrid Strategy Achievable?

C/B/664. Discuss the differences between Porter's framework of generic strategies and Bowman's strategy clock. Use either of these frameworks to identify the strategic choices that BP Exploration appears to have made.

C/B/702. It could be argued that Porter's frameworks and generic strategies are not applicable to today's tourism and hospitality industries. Critically evaluate this statement and present an analysis of other frameworks and strategies which may be of mor

C/B/421. 'Stuck in the Middle' - Analysis of Porter's Generic Strategy

C/B/514. Blockbuster vs. Skype

C/B/562. Ryanair: Marketing Strategies UK Bomb Plot 10/8

E/B/210. Analysis of pharmaceutical industry

E/B/285. Report on Michelin Tire PLC

C/B/264. Strategic Analysis of Tesco

C/B/265. Nokia business strategy analysis

P/M/283. Explain how human resources can be used to implement Porters generic strategies of cost leadership and differentiation, comparing the cost and benefits of this resource and identifying the main issues that management will need to be aware of.

P/M/61. Porter's Generic Strategy: Porter's Three Generic Strategies

 

Enter supporting content here